Skip Navigation

Journal of Plant Ecology 2009 2(1):21-29; doi:10.1093/jpe/rtp004
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sapkota, I. P.
Right arrow Articles by Odén, P. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences and the Botanical Society of China. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Gap characteristics and their effects on regeneration, dominance and early growth of woody species

Indra Prasad Sapkota* and Per Christer Odén

Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Southern Swedish Forest Research Centre, Tropical Silviculture and Seed Science Group, PO Box 49, SE-230 53 Alnarp, Sweden

* Corresponding author: Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Southern Swedish Forest Research Centre, Tropical Silviculture and Seed Science Group, PO Box 49, SE-230 53 Alnarp, Sweden. E-mail: isapkota{at}gmail.com

Aims: We aim to examine the canopy gap characteristics and evaluate their influence on regeneration, dominance and the early growth of woody species in seasonally dry Shorea robusta forests (Sal forests).

Methods: Sixty canopy gaps were surveyed in six randomly located transects belts in seasonally dry subtropical Sal forests of central Nepal. Each transect belt was followed until 10 gap sites were encountered. The equation for the area of an ellipse was used to calculate the size of canopy gap, measuring the longest axis and its perpendicular shorter axis. Number, sizes, ages and causes of tree falls creating canopy gaps along with number and sizes of border trees were identified and recorded. Detailed gap inventories were carried out using square 25-m2 quadrats placed in the middle of each gap. All individuals >2 m in height within the quadrat were identified at the species level and their diameter at breast height was measured. We assigned a nested 4-m2 quadrat to the corner of each 25-m2 quadrat, within which all woody individuals >10 cm tall were identified at the species level, and counted them and their regeneration mechanisms were identified. The height and collar diameter of the tallest individuals were measured. Descriptive statistics was calculated for the variables of interests and Pearson correlation, linear regression, independent-sample t-test and chi-square test were used to relate them and to test for their associations.

Important Findings: The study found mean gap size of 283 m2 and ~50% gaps of 10–15 years old. Gaps created by natural single-tree falls were significantly more numerous, and their mean size was significantly smaller than those resulting from artificial causes or multiple-tree falls. Gap size correlated with the basal area of felled trees, but it did not correlate with the number of tree falls. While tree fall basal area was significantly positively correlated to the seed-originated seedling to resprout ratio, it was negatively correlated, along with gap area and the basal size of retained trees, to seedling growth. The relative seedling density of Terminalia alata increased with increases in gap areas, while that of S.robusta decreased with increases in tree fall basal area, thereby lowering the plot-level dominance. However, the relative seedling densities of Eugenia operculata and Syzigium cumini were negatively and positively correlated, respectively, with tree fall basal area.

Keywords: canopy gap • seedling density • seedling growth • basal area • Sal forests • Nepal


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.