Skip Navigation

Journal of Plant Ecology 2008 1(1):25-32; doi:10.1093/jpe/rtm007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow An erratum has been published
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wang, X.
Right arrow Articles by McPeek, T. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences and the Botanical Society of China. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Biomass responses to intraspecific competition differ between wild species and CO2

Xianzhong Wang1,*, Angela R. Ngigi1, Daniel L. Smith1,2 and Tamara M. McPeek1

1 Department of Biology, Indiana University–Purdue University Indianapolis, 723 West, Michigan Street, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
2 Department of Biological Sciences, Butler University, 4600 Sunset Avenue, Indianapolis, IN 46208, USA

* Correspondence address. Department of Biology, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, 723 West Michigan Street, Indianapolis, Indiana 46202, USA. E-mail: xzwang{at}iupui.edu

Aims: How growth of wild and crop species responds to global environmental perturbations has both ecological and agricultural significance in a changing world. The primary aim of this synthesis was to quantitatively assess the interactive effects of intraspecific competition and elevated CO2 on biomass production in herbaceous species.

Methods: Using meta-analytical techniques, we synthesized data from publications before 2006 that reported biomass responses to elevated CO2 in 321 herbaceous species grown in isolation or in competition with con-specific individuals.

Important findings: Intraspecific competition differentially modified biomass responses to elevated CO2 in wild and crop species. For example, competition reduced CO2 stimulation of total biomass (WT) from 27 to 23% in wild species, but by a much greater magnitude, i.e., from 43 to 32% in crops. Competition had no effect on responses of either above- (WAG) or below-ground (WBG) biomass to elevated CO2 in wild species, but significantly diminished CO2 enhancement of WAG, although not of WBG, in crops. Considerable variations were found among functional groups in the modification of growth responses to elevated CO2 by intraspecific competition, which exerted greater depression on CO2 enhancement in C3 than in C4 species and in non-legumes than in legumes. Elevated CO2 affected leaf and stem growth of individually grown C3 graminoids and forbs similarly, but increased leaf growth only in C4 graminoids and stem growth only in C4 forbs. Results from this synthesis demonstrated that intraspecific competition differentially affected growth responses to elevated CO2 in wild and crop species. The wild–crop species differences will have important implications for understanding primary production by herbaceous species in both natural and agricultural ecosystems in the future when atmospheric CO2 is significantly higher than the current level.

Keywords: biomass production • CO2 enrichment • functional groups • meta-analysis


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.